Its Food and Water and Heritage Life Skills
In this week's Woodpile Report. Ol' Remus discusses the importance of food in his opening monologue. As always, he doesn't disappoint nor waste time getting to his point. Food is a must. I beat this drum like a child driving his parents nuts with the constant thumping of the new drum set purchased by the grandparent or good friend who knows the thumping will get under the skin after a while. Food, food, food. We buy all types of insurance, drive through foods, and stuff that will be forgotten in a week. But, folks simply ignore the need to stock some food for rainy days. The corner store will always be open. We will run to the local box store before the storm hits or when the flag goes up to the chant of "Danger, Will Rogers." It must be programmed in to the majority of humans. Put off what isn't a high priority until it is needed. Wait, how can anyone not place food as a priority when we must have it to survive.
If you read my book, Hope For Survival, and have hung out at the website long enough, or attended any of my training classes, you have heard me stress the importance of food and water. You will need many other resources to survive, however, without food and water you are toast. And if you didn't stock it, plan for it, stack for it, identify how you would have it or move it, account for it, identify how much you will need... you will face certain problems.
The article below is a great advertisement for two new classes I will be teaching at Heritage Life Skills 2020 in Waynesville, NC in early May 2020. I have been working with Festus on this project to have available by HLS 2020. The courses are titled Preparedness 102 and Preparedness 103. They are a sequential series building off of Preparedness 101. The Prep 101 Course is about the individual, Preparedness 102 is about the team, and Preparedness 103 is about the community. The exciting part of Preparedness 103 is the attendee will use the information taught in Prep 101 and 102 to work as a team to build a community and react to hazards and threats while sustaining life and the community concept. It will include building plans, bartering, memorandums of agreement and understanding, setting up community security, planning and accounting for food resources, reacting to different types of threats, building a cache, when to Bug Out, if at all, setting up community councils, communication planning, medical, role playing leadership positions and so forth. Attendees will be broken in to teams based on skills and/or desire. Teams will have a designated time to do task and meet objectives. Once the time elapses each team will them present their community information to the other two groups and myself. We will then have a period to have open discussions on the team responses and project. If you want to participate and be a part of this effort mark your calendar to attend the event.
If you read many of the Post Apoc books by the man excellent authors, you will see some of the same story formats that Ol' Remus mentions one should plan for in their building and planning. The new courses will do the same except it will be live and you can participate.
Okay, on to the article. Enjoy...
From Woodpile Report, 22 Oct 2019 - http://woodpilereport.com/html/index-600.htm
As in all war, food would be weaponized in a Civil War II. We don't have to go back to antiquity for examples, more recent events provide a long list, some of which are:
Sherman's "scorched earth" campaign began on November 15th  when he cut the last telegraph wire that linked him to his superiors in the North. He left Atlanta in flames and pointed his army south. No word would be heard from him for the next five weeks. Unbeknownst to his enemy, Sherman's objective was the port of Savannah. His army of 65,000 cut a broad swath as it lumbered towards its destination. Plantations were burned, crops destroyed and stores of food pillaged.
The War Orders given by the Admiralty on 26 August 1914 were clear enough. All food consigned to Germany through neutral ports was to be captured and all food consigned to Rotterdam was to be presumed consigned to Germany. The British were determined on the starvation policy, whether or not it was lawful. The average daily diet of 1,000 calories was insufficient to maintain a good standard of health, resulting by 1917 in widespread disorders caused by malnutrition such as scurvy, tuberculosis, and dysentery. In December 1918, the National Health Office in Berlin calculated that 763,000 persons had died as a result of the blockade by that time.
By the fall of 1932 it became apparent that Ukraine's grain harvest was going to miss Soviet planners' target by 60 percent. Stalin then ordered what little they had be confiscated as punishment for not meeting quotas. The Ukrainian famine by one estimate claimed the lives of 3.9 million people, about 13 percent of the population. In June of 1933, at the height of the Holodomor, 28,000 men, women and children in Ukraine were dying of starvation each day.
Britain imported 70% of its food; this required 20 million tons of shipping a year. Knowing this would lead the Axis powers into hoping to starve the British population into submission, by cutting off those food supply lines. By the end of 1940, 728,000 tons of food making its way to Britain had been lost, sunk by German submarine activity.
In September 1944, trains in the Netherlands ground to a halt. Dutch railway workers were hoping that a strike could stop the transport of Nazi troops, helping the advancing Allied forces. But the Allied campaign failed, and the Nazis punished the Netherlands by blocking food supplies, plunging much of the country into famine. By the time the Netherlands was liberated in May 1945, more than 20,000 people had died of starvation.
The problem was not just harvests and the cutting off imports, transportation problems developed. Fuel shortages made it increasingly difficult getting food from the countryside into the cities. Food Shortages had begun to appear in some parts of the country even before Pearl Harbor. By 1944 theft of produce still in the fields led police to speak of a new class of "vegetable thieves" and the new crime of "field vandalizing". The average calorie intake per person had by late 1945 declined to far less than deemed necessary even for an individual engaged in light work.
Stalin's blockade of Berlin from June 1948 through May 1949 was an attempt to starve West Berlin's two million inhabitants into accepting Soviet rule. The city quickly devolved into near-famine. A largely American airlift rescued it and kept it alive.
The US has historically used food as part of carrot-and-stick diplomacy, or said differently, bribes. During the Second World War, Great Britain and the Soviet Union relied crucially on American food, assuring a measure of their dependency in power negotiations. Germany, and particularly Japan, were nearly US territories after the war, both would have starved without prompt delivery of American food in quantity.
Wars are generally about food. Ancient Rome imported its food and fought epic wars to develop new sources and keep the ones it had. Medieval fiefdoms were agricultural enterprises, raiding their neighbors was common. The westward expansion of America in the nineteenth century was about food and the means to move it, as was Japan's expanding empire in the early twentieth century. Germany explicitly cited food production to justify its aggression in the east. Their rants about fighting Bolshevism was pep rally stuff, Nazism itself was excessively patriotic Marxism.
History and cold calculation suggest food would be a weapon in a Civil War II, one of many, but of prime importance long term. Civil wars have long gestations, go kinetic suddenly and get complicated in a hurry. We have no firm knowledge what would set it off, who would be actively involved or how it would end. But the outlines are repeated well enough to guide our preparations.
The ruling class already treats middle America as this century's Untermensch. Nothing is off the table in a civil war. Seizing the nation's food would be an obvious move. Expect them to deploy troops to secure big ag and the necessary transportation facilities, destroy anyone who got in their way and terrorize potential troublemakers. But there's a limit to even the deep state's resources. Prudent survivalists in the far hills wouldn't warrant their attention, they'd be more likely to trade shots with desperados than find themselves in a firefight with regular forces.
Food is the indispensable survival prep. At minimum this means a secure long-term stash of high calorie food sufficient to outlast the initial violence and privation without relying on resupply. Call it a year, maybe two.
Preppers are kidding themselves about large, elaborate enclaves. Such communities with their gardens, livestock, solar powered utilities, weapons, comms, storehouses, workshops, tools and supplies would be fatally attractive. Training with light infantry tactics and weapons is understandable, but repelling serial attacks by gangs and other armed opportunists would include attrition, i.e., the worker bees would win battles but eventually too few would remain to run the place. And when it became unviable, so would they.
Such redoubts have their place when the meltdown eases, but in the initial phases, less is more.
Well placed and practiced survivalists could get by on a onesey-twosey basis. Two may survive where one wouldn't. Three or four may be better, assuming an adequate reserve of food and supplies. With more than four the liabilities are likely to outweigh the advantages. It assumes the deepest of deep larders, extensive supplies and harmonious wisdom in all things. Unless each make an irreplaceable contribution of critical value it's probably too big a footprint for this phase. Loosely allying with similar small groups for mutual benefit may be the better choice. Five or more is a crowd, a danger to itself.
Famine is a given in contemporary civil war. Those embedded in interior cities have no chance, so, next item. The ruling class would continue to work against middle America's existence. As said above, they'd confiscate local stores of food on a continuing basis, seize major food producing areas intact and grab the needed transportation facilities. Make no mistake, their hirelings would be granted license for absolute ruthlessness. Free fire zones and minefields are not off the table. Skilled labor, if otherwise unwilling, would be arrested and compelled to work.
Feeding their base would guarantee the loyalty of supporters, inflict mass death on the deplorables by 'no cost' neglect and keep armed confrontation largely confined to flyover country. But note, as said here before, this is a precarious solution. The coastal megacities are fed from the outside by vulnerable arteries passing through what would be hostile territory. In the end, feeding them would stutter and fail. Even now they're cauldrons of seething hatred, barely repressed, often organized. With real scarcity and hardship they'd fall on each other and tear the place apart.
Privation, disease, hunger, murderous chaos and high intensity combat would likely peak in the second year. This is the knothole which would separate the survivalists from dabblers and hopeful idealists. In the years that follow, when the maelstrom had largely exhausted itself and the situation clarified, those who made good use of their resources could be largely self-supporting, coale